How the UK's charities take donations online

A measured census of 73,687 charity websites across the UK - every charity on the three UK registers (CCEW, OSCR and CCNI) with a usable recorded website, every income band; grant-making trusts excluded, excluding the religious-causes population (sectors.yml 2026-08-19.1; 73,687 of 99,606 sites). Every figure was read directly from the sites by NebulaBot, our crawler, and everything here is aggregate only - no charity is identifiable. The statistics cover the 34,843 sites that engage with donations online - see Understanding the data. This is a census, not a sample: every registered UK charity whose recorded website answered, measured in one pass. Every detector's error rate is measured against a blind hand-labelled sample - see Validation in the method section.

59.0%
of donation-engaged sites show a way to give
20,556 of 34,843 sites
41.0%
ask for donations but give no way to act
14,287 sites - the gap, see §8
38.1%
send the donor to somebody else's website
13,270 sites - 5,671 on JustGiving alone

In short

What we found

We wanted to answer a plain question: if you decided today to give money to a UK charity, could you? So we sent NebulaBot, our crawler, to look - not at a sample, but at every charity on the three UK registers with a website address on file, 73,687 of them, read once each in a single pass.

55,300 of those sites answered with a real page; the rest were dead, parked, or wouldn't let NebulaBot in - a finding in itself, and one the register paper takes up separately. Of the sites that answered, 20,457 neither take donations nor mention them - churches, village halls, clubs funded by their members. Not seeking donations online is a choice, so this paper measures the 34,843 sites that engage with donations at all. Understanding the data explains the cut.

Of those 34,843 donation-engaged sites, 20,556 - 59.0% - showed a visible way to give: a donate button, a link out to a giving platform, or a donation form. The other 14,287 - 41.0% - ask for donations but give a donor no way to act. That gap is what this paper is about.

When charities do take money online, most of them send you off to another website to do it. 13,270 sites hand the donor to an external platform rather than taking the gift themselves, and 5,671 of those - 42.7% of them - use JustGiving alone.

The bigger the charity, the likelier you can give. Among the 9,871 sites in the micro (under £25k) band, 49.0% had a route we could see; among the 2,960 in the large (£2m+) band it was 63.4%. Which is to say the charities with the least money are also the ones finding it hardest to be given any.

One pattern stood out. 7,357 of the 18,111 WordPress sites that answered - 40.6% - send their donors to a third party, on a platform that can take the donation on the charity's own page. Most of those platforms take a cut or charge fees, and the donor's details stay with the platform unless the donor chooses to share them - at the exact moment someone decided to give.

One caveat before you quote anything: 14,287 of the sites scored as having no route do mention donations somewhere on the page. Some genuinely can't take a donation online; for others, NebulaBot read the homepage and one donate page and may simply have missed it. Section 8 sets out how far that could stretch.

01 · The denominator

73,687 sites fetched, 55,300 answered, 34,843 engage with donations

We fetched 73,687 sites. 18,387 gave us nothing usable because the site was dead, parked, or behind an anti-bot check; 55,300 answered with a real page. Of those, 20,457 neither take donations nor mention them, so they sit outside the question this paper asks. Every percentage on this page is based on the 34,843 donation-engaged sites, unless it says otherwise - Understanding the data explains the cut. For scale: the three UK registers list 203,701 charities between them, and only those with a usable recorded website could enter this page's population - no figure here says anything about the charities with no website at all.

Fig. 1From fetched to answered to engaged to donatingPNG
Websites fetched73,687
Answered with a real page55,300
Engage with donations34,843
Visible donation route20,556 · 59.0%
Source: measured crawl across the UK, August 2026 - every charity on the three UK registers (CCEW, OSCR and CCNI) with a usable recorded website, every income band; grant-making trusts excluded, excluding the religious-causes population (sectors.yml 2026-08-19.1; 73,687 of 99,606 sites)

Understanding the data

Who the statistics cover, and who they leave out

Churches and religious bodies are excluded from these figures. Charities whose declared purpose is religious activity are removed from the population before any figure on this page is worked out. A parish church and a children's charity are different kinds of organisation with different reasons for having a website, and this research is about the second kind. The exclusion is deliberately broad, built from the three registers' own religious-activity tags, the whole Religion category of the UK-CAT taxonomy and a parochial-church-council name rule, and it errs towards removing a borderline record rather than keeping one. It is an attempt rather than a guarantee: a religious organisation that declares a non-religious purpose will still be in the population.

This paper asks how charities take donations online, so its statistics cover the 34,843 websites that engage with donations at all: a visible donation route, or a mention of donating without one.

The 20,457 answering sites that neither take donations nor mention them are excluded from every share unless a section says otherwise. Most are small member-funded organisations - village halls, scout groups, sports clubs, local societies - that raise money in other ways. Not seeking donations online is a choice, not a gap, and counting them would make every figure here say less about the charities the topic is actually about.

For the record, across all 55,300 answering sites, 20,556 (37.2%) show a visible donation route.

Two honesty notes. The engagement boundary is itself detected from page text - a site that asks for donations only in an image, or only on a page we never read, can be missed - and the mention signal is not separately scored in the Validation table. And §7 (affiliate shopping) deliberately covers every answering site, because affiliate schemes matter most on exactly the sites outside this cut.

02 · Where the money goes

The most common donation route is somebody else's website

The chart below covers every donation-engaged site. The most common way the UK's charities take donations online is through somebody else's website.

Fig. 2Donation route, all 34,843 donation-engaged sitesPNG
External platform · 38.1%Nothing found · 41.0%
  • External platform13,270 · 38.1%
  • Payment button4,941 · 14.2%
  • WordPress plugin1,611 · 4.6%
  • Own form734 · 2.1%
  • Nothing found14,287 · 41.0%
Source: measured crawl of UK charity websites, August 2026 · a site's route is the strongest signal found - see method
What each route means, with counts
RouteSitesShareWhat it means
Sent to an external platform13,27038.1%The donor leaves the site for JustGiving, CAF (the Charities Aid Foundation), Enthuse and the like.
A payment button on their own page4,94114.2%PayPal, Stripe or similar bolted on. They can take a card; there's no donation experience around it.
A WordPress donation plugin1,6114.6%A donation plugin already in place. They've already decided they want on-site donations.
A hand-rolled form7342.1%Posts to a donation-shaped URL on their own site, with no platform we recognise behind it.
Nothing found14,28741.0%Not on the homepage, and not on the one donate page we followed.

03 · The platform league table

A concentrated market with a long, thin tail

13,270 sites send donors to an external platform, and most use one of a handful of big names. Another 20 platforms sit below the chart, each used by 194 sites or fewer.

The top three platforms are used by 62.4% of the sites that send donors offsite - 8,278 of 13,270 sites. JustGiving alone is 42.7%.
Fig. 3External donation platforms, by sites using eachPNG
JustGiving5,671 · 42.7%
CAF1,795 · 13.5%
Enthuse812 · 6.1%
PayPal Giving Fund764 · 5.8%
Donorbox633 · 4.8%
Beacon575 · 4.3%
Localgiving575 · 4.3%
GoFundMe552 · 4.2%
Give as you Live (donate)469 · 3.5%
Crowdfunder355 · 2.7%
Stripe (hosted donate page)267 · 2.0%
Peoples Fundraising226 · 1.7%
Share of the 13,270 sites whose route is an external platform · Source: measured crawl of UK charity websites, August 2026
All 32 external platforms

958 sites link to more than one platform and are counted once per platform, so the rows sum to more than 13,270 and the shares to a little over 100%.

PlatformSitesShare of offsite sites
JustGiving5,67142.7%
CAF1,79513.5%
Enthuse8126.1%
PayPal Giving Fund7645.8%
Donorbox6334.8%
Beacon5754.3%
Localgiving5754.3%
GoFundMe5524.2%
Give as you Live (donate)4693.5%
Crowdfunder3552.7%
Stripe (hosted donate page)2672.0%
Peoples Fundraising2261.7%
Fundraise Up1941.5%
Givey1711.3%
Virgin Money Giving (closed February 2022)1671.3%
TotalGiving1641.2%
Wonderful1491.1%
Big Give1220.9%
KindLink1200.9%
Blackbaud1150.9%
Now Donate960.7%
Raisely810.6%
GoodHub710.5%
Give A Little640.5%
Stewardship460.3%
MuchLoved300.2%
Dona170.1%
Donr140.1%
Classy140.1%
CharityExtra120.1%
Chuffed110.1%
Parish Giving Scheme10.0%
Every donation technology seen, on any route

The league counts only sites whose route is an external platform. This counts every signal on every route - which is how the generic gateways become visible: PayPal and Stripe together appear on more sites than any named platform except JustGiving, and neither is a donation product.

TechnologyRoute it impliesSites
JustGivingExternal platform5,784
PayPal (button)Payment button4,184
CAFExternal platform1,818
Stripe (JS on their own page)Payment button1,811
GiveWPWordPress plugin1,232
EnthuseExternal platform829
PayPal Giving FundExternal platform776
An on-site form we could not identifyTheir own form734
DonorboxExternal platform639
BeaconExternal platform597
LocalgivingExternal platform585
GoFundMeExternal platform563
Give as you Live (donate)External platform478
CrowdfunderExternal platform363
Stripe (hosted donate page)External platform271
CharitableWordPress plugin234
Peoples FundraisingExternal platform228
SumUpPayment button218
Fundraise UpExternal platform206
GiveyExternal platform174
DonorfyPayment button173
Virgin Money Giving (closed February 2022)External platform170
TotalGivingExternal platform168
WonderfulExternal platform152
GoCardlessPayment button131
Big GiveExternal platform128
SquarePayment button122
KindLinkExternal platform122
BlackbaudExternal platform119
A WordPress donation pluginWordPress plugin116
Now DonateExternal platform96
RaiselyExternal platform82
GoodHubExternal platform73
Give A LittleExternal platform64
CiviCRMWordPress plugin48
StewardshipExternal platform46
MuchLovedExternal platform30
WP Simple PayWordPress plugin20
WorldpayPayment button19
DonaExternal platform17
DonrExternal platform14
ClassyExternal platform14
CharityExtraExternal platform13
ChuffedExternal platform11
Parish Giving SchemeExternal platform1

04 · By income band

Donation routes climb with income, then level off at £2m

Donation routes climb steadily with charity income up to the mid band (£100k-2m); the large band (£2m+) sits level with it rather than above. Bigger charities are also likelier to have chosen a proper platform rather than a bolted-on payment button. The large band covers 2,960 sites - far fewer than the others, simply because few charities are that big.

Fig. 4Donation route, by charity income bandPNG
Micro (under £25k)9,871 sites
49.0% any route
Small (£25k-100k)7,509 sites
56.8% any route
Mid (£100k-2m)13,261 sites
67.8% any route
Large (£2m+)2,960 sites
63.4% any route
  • External platform
  • Payment button
  • WordPress plugin
  • Own form
  • Nothing found
Source: measured crawl of UK charity websites, August 2026
The full cross-tab (cells below 10 suppressed)
Income bandSitesExternalPayment buttonPluginOwn formNoneAny route
Micro (under £25k)9,8712,7641,5174051475,03849.0%
Small (£25k-100k)7,5092,7431,125298993,24456.8%
Mid (£100k-2m)13,2616,2571,7846942624,26467.8%
Large (£2m+)2,9601,1933371372111,08263.4%
Income unknown1,242313178771565946.9%

05 · By website platform

What a site is built on tracks how it takes money

Donation plugins are almost exclusively a WordPress story - the cross-tab below shows a handful of installs on Drupal, Joomla and bespoke sites. On most other platforms, a charity can either send the donor to an external site or add a payment button. Squarespace charities take donations at lower rates than WordPress (55.7% vs 66.0%), almost entirely by sending donors elsewhere. The quiet outlier is Webflow, highest on the board at 73.7% of its 358 sites - small numbers, best read with care.

Fig. 5Donation route, by website platformPNG
WordPress18,111 sites
66.0% any route
Other or bespoke6,991 sites
50.4% any route
Wix4,322 sites
46.9% any route
Squarespace2,493 sites
55.7% any route
Drupal546 sites
58.1% any route
GoDaddy Website Builder538 sites
62.8% any route
Weebly436 sites
54.4% any route
Webflow358 sites
73.7% any route
Google Sites335 sites
50.7% any route
Joomla322 sites
60.9% any route
HubSpot163 sites
25.2% any route
Shopify101 sites
46.5% any route
SharePoint56 sites
42.9% any route
Umbraco36 sites
47.2% any route
Everything else (4 platforms)35 sites
40.0% any route
  • External platform
  • Payment button
  • WordPress plugin
  • Own form
  • Nothing found
Source: measured crawl of UK charity websites, August 2026
The full cross-tab (cells below 10 suppressed)
PlatformSitesExternalPayment buttonPluginOwn formNoneAny route
WordPress18,1117,3572,5831,5774356,15966.0%
Other or bespoke6,9912,2581,030<102243,47050.4%
Wix4,3221,449576<10<102,29346.9%
Squarespace2,4931,1772100<101,10455.7%
Drupal546151108174122958.1%
GoDaddy Website Builder5381851530020062.8%
Weebly43615084<10019954.4%
Webflow35820460009473.7%
Google Sites335126440016550.7%
Joomla32211461<101912660.9%
HubSpot16330100<1012225.2%
Shopify10136100<105446.5%
SharePoint5616<10<10<103242.9%
Umbraco36<10<100<101947.2%
Everything else (4 platforms)35<10<10002140.0%

06 · The WordPress picture

Most WordPress charities don't use WordPress to take donations

18,111
donation-engaged WordPress charity sites
40.6%
send their donors to a third party
7,357 of 18,111 sites
8.7%
use a donation plugin instead
1,577 sites
Fig. 6WordPress sites, by donation routePNG
Sent to an external platform7,357 · 40.6%
Nothing found6,159 · 34.0%
A payment button2,583 · 14.3%
A donation plugin already in place1,577 · 8.7%
Source: measured crawl of UK charity websites, August 2026 · shares of 18,111 donation-engaged WordPress sites

WordPress has well-established donation plugins, but most WordPress charities don't use them. Instead they send donors to external platforms that mostly take a cut or charge fees, and where the donor's details stay unless the donor chooses to share them. For some charities that will be the right choice - but the numbers suggest many have never compared the options.

Disclosure: Nebula Design builds a WordPress donation product, so we have an interest in this comparison - the method section says how that is handled in these figures.

07 · Affiliate shopping

Affiliate shopping is not a donation route

Unlike the rest of the paper, this section covers all 55,300 answering sites - an affiliate footer is often the only money-shaped link on exactly the sites outside the donation-engaged population.

3,046 sites (5.5%) carry an affiliate shopping scheme - a supporter buys something elsewhere and a commission arrives later. No donor ever gives through these, so they're recorded separately and never counted as a route. 1,240 of them have a passive scheme and no detectable donation route at all. A site can carry several schemes (328 do), so the bars sum to more than the site count.

Fig. 7Affiliate shopping schemes seen on charity sitesPNG
easyfundraising2,293
Give as you Live (shopping)547
AmazonSmile483
TheGivingMachine62
Source: measured crawl of UK charity websites, August 2026 · AmazonSmile highlighted - it no longer exists
Note: AmazonSmile closed in February 2023, and 483 UK charity sites still link to it - a clear sign of donation pages nobody has looked at in years.

08 · The "none" problem

The sites that ask for donations but give no way to act

14,287 of the 34,843 donation-engaged sites scored none: they ask for donations on the page, and NebulaBot could not find a way to act on it. Some genuinely have no online route; for others, the crawler missed it. Our blind sample scores the route detector at 0.66 agreement across 87 hand-labelled sites, the weakest detector behind this paper. That is a bound on how far this figure could move, not a correction to it: the agreement is measured across every route, not on this category alone. A score of none only means we found nothing on the homepage or on the one donate page we followed - so a form three clicks deep, or a widget drawn by JavaScript, ends up in this category.

Fig. 8Sites that ask for donations, and how many give no way to actPNG
Engage with donations34,843
…of which give no way to act14,287 · 41.0%
Source: measured crawl of UK charity websites, August 2026
Where the none verdicts came from

A verdict from a followed donate page is stronger evidence than one from the homepage alone: a donate page that named no platform leans towards the route genuinely not being there.

Verdict came fromSitesReading
No donate link on the homepage7,310Weakest evidence - we never looked past the homepage.
We followed a donate page and still found nothing6,977Strongest evidence - a donate page that named no platform, read fresh or from our cache.
Note: 59.0% is "of donation-engaged sites", not "of all UK charities". Across all 55,300 answering sites the visible-route share is 37.2%, and the 20,457 sites that neither take nor mention donations are excluded throughout - see Understanding the data. Within this population the figure has soft edges both ways: if every one of the 1,328 suspect builder-gateway verdicts in weakness 1 is a false positive it falls to 55.2%, and every missed route raises it. 59.0% is our best single estimate.

09 · Key takeaways

Ready to quote

Feel free to copy and share these. All figures come from our UK-wide census (September 2026) - please credit Nebula Design and link back to this paper.

Known weaknesses, and method

Known weaknesses, in priority order

1 · Payment JS on a hosted builder may not mean donations (1,328 of 4,941 payment-button verdicts)

Squarespace, Wix, Weebly, Webflow, Google Sites and ChurchSuite load Stripe and PayPal for their own shop or ticketing. The first hand-labelled validation case is exactly this - the detector said gateway/Stripe, the human said none, and the human was right: that Stripe is ticket checkout. This is our largest known source of false positives, and we've deliberately not patched it yet: writing a rule now would swap a measurable error for an unmeasurable one, and the validation sample already includes enough of these cases to measure the effect properly.

2 · A supporter fundraising page is not the charity's own route (1,772 sites flagged)

A page about how supporters raise money links to JustGiving because that's where supporters set up their pages. We use link ranking and a weak_link flag to catch this, and any platform attributed to a flagged site should be treated with caution.

3 · "none" is not "no donations"

The single biggest limitation on this page - see §8 above.

4 · 167 sites route to a platform that no longer exists

Virgin Money Giving closed in February 2022. The link is visible, so the route counts as visible - the measurement is honest - but a donor following it cannot give. These sites stay in the totals because the page measures visible routes; this note is here so nobody quotes the headline as working routes.

Validation

Every detector behind this page was scored against a blind, hand-labelled random sample of 102 sites drawn from the Bristol pilot crawl (labels fixed before scoring; scored 2026-08-18). The detectors are unchanged between that crawl and this one. A dash means the statistic is undefined on the sample, not zero.

DetectornScore Statistic
WordPress detection871.00precision · recall 1.00
Platform identification871.00agreement
Donation platform naming570.93agreement
Donation route870.66agreement
Cookie analytics980.93precision · recall 0.83
Cookieless analytics79—precision · recall 0.00
Consent tool1010.79precision · recall 0.83

Method

Every figure was computed from pages already in the local cache - at most the homepage plus one donate link that actually appears in that homepage's HTML. No path is ever guessed, robots.txt is honoured, and opted-out domains are never fetched. A site's route is the strongest signal found, in the order wp_plugin, offsite_platform, onsite_gateway. Affiliate shopping schemes are recorded separately and never scored as a route. We made no attempt to detect Gift Aid capture, so no figure here says anything about it - a candidate for a future pass. The population is every charity on the three UK registers (CCEW, OSCR and CCNI) with a usable recorded website, every income band; grant-making trusts excluded, excluding the religious-causes population (sectors.yml 2026-08-19.1; 73,687 of 99,606 sites), whose recorded website answered: 73,687 fetched sites, 34,843 of which answered with a real page. Cross-tab cells below 10 are suppressed. Disclosure: our own donation product is detected by the same pipeline; sites running it are counted in the route aggregates like any other plugin, but the brand is not named or ranked anywhere in this report.

What comes next: the same crawl measured more than donations. Two companion papers are live: Can you trust email from the UK's charities? (SPF, DMARC and MX for every domain here) and Cookies, consent and the UK's charity websites (analytics and consent tooling on every readable homepage). The basics of accessible markup are also recorded for every site and will publish as their own paper. The aggregate table behind every figure on this page is released under CC-BY (see How to cite) so anyone can recompute them.

How to cite this page

Quote any figure freely with credit. For a formal reference:

Nebula Design (2026). How the UK's charities take donations online: a census of 73,687 charity websites. Nebula Design Research, August 2026. Version 2.0, crawl of 23 August 2026. https://nebula.design/research/uk-charity-donation-platforms-2026/

The aggregate table behind every figure is data.csv - every number on this page can be recomputed from it.

All aggregate figures are released under CC BY 4.0; register data is used under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (Crown Copyright). This page carries no information about any individual charity.